More on Windmills
There were some comments on BoingBoing on the last post. I thought I'd restate. Any self-correcting system can be in homeostasis, or use a cybernetic control. IBM autonomic systems are homeostatic, so is the canonical example of a thermostat-controlled room.
That's not the point. A windmill is homeostatic without recourse to an external monitor. We might call it isohomeostatic, as opposed to the IBM or thermostat metahomeostatic. Of course, those are terrible words and I wouldn't really use them in polite company.
I will point out, however, that evolution is an isohomeostat: the force of change (death of the unfit) is exactly the thing that imparts the change (change in the gene frequency of the surviving population).
There were some comments on BoingBoing on the last post. I thought I'd restate. Any self-correcting system can be in homeostasis, or use a cybernetic control. IBM autonomic systems are homeostatic, so is the canonical example of a thermostat-controlled room.
That's not the point. A windmill is homeostatic without recourse to an external monitor. We might call it isohomeostatic, as opposed to the IBM or thermostat metahomeostatic. Of course, those are terrible words and I wouldn't really use them in polite company.
I will point out, however, that evolution is an isohomeostat: the force of change (death of the unfit) is exactly the thing that imparts the change (change in the gene frequency of the surviving population).

<< Home